Features - Written by David on Tuesday, July 22, 2008 17:20 - 3 Comments

Madden 09: Running to the Shelves

Tags: , ,

One game has been getting me incredibly excited for the last few weeks. The upcoming Madden installment is coming soon, and it has me drooling. The only thing I can do to quench my thirst is to talk football. I would absolutely love to go through each and every team and their top 2 running backs, but that would take a little too long, so I’m just going to highlight the really unsettling numbers.

Let’s start with Buffalo’s second year back Marshawn Lynch. Lynch ran for 1115 yards, averaged 4.0 yards/carry and had 7 touchdowns. He missed 3 games with injuries, so those numbers are slightly less than what they could have been. They are, however, still extremely mediocre. His 90 rating in Madden 09 isn’t so mediocre. This is a relatively unproven kid, who although did well, only broke 100 yards rushing 3 times, and had only 18 catches all year long. Ryan Grant broke 100 yards on the ground 5 times, had 8 touchdowns, and averaged a astounding 5.1 yards/carry in only starting the last 10 games. He has an 86 rating, which is one I agree with, because he’s only had 1 year in the NFL, and still needs to prove he can replicate that success even after defences have prepared for him.

Edgerrin James is a 92. Gross. I feel dirty just typing it. He was good at one time, but that time is over. He is now 30 and his skills are diminishing. I don’t even want to talk about it. I’m getting upset. Let me move on…

LT is a 99. I think I’m okay with that.

I’m a little wary of Larry Johnson’s 94, but at the same time: when has any player not completely rebounded after a season plagued by injuries and poor performances? (see Shaun Alexander)

Jacksonville has two very good backs, and I’m glad the stat guys at EA recognized this. Fred Taylor is a 94 (maybe a little high) and Maurice Jones-Drew a 91. Hopefully their running attack works as well in the game as it does in real life.

Willie Parker is an enigma wrapped in a riddle. This guy has skill, yet managed only 2 touchdowns all year in 2007. I like the 93 rating, because he really can be that good, but I think it’s better to start him lower and bring him up in roster updates.

Adrian Peterson’s 95 is just right.

Darren McFadden is an 85. Rating rookies is one of the hardest things to do in the entire world (I’m totally not even exaggerating, those doctors curing cancer have no idea), but I think they got this one right. 85 is a little low for a starter, but still very good for someone who has never played a down in the NFL. I have a feeling that McFadden will have a similar year to JaMarcus Russell; they will both have their moments, but the growing pains will be tough in Oakland.

Madden 09 is set to be released on August 12th in North America. NFL Head Coach 09 can also be bought in a bundle with Madden 09 on the 12th, but won’t be sold alone until September.

From SportsGamer

3 Comments

You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Ben
Jul 22, 2008 19:46

The Edge getting a 92? I definitely have to agree with you on that rating being extremely bloated. Personally I would put him at highest an 86-88. Willie Parker, while only managing 2 TD’s rating is still accurate I would say, his overall is high, but I’m sure his goaline (toughness) rating would not be as high, we have to remember that he is NOT Jerome Bettis.

Tricky T
Jul 23, 2008 20:20

Just wondering, why use a 1-100 rating if no player dips below 80? Couldn’t they use a 1-10 rating? Makes sense to me. Anyways, totally agree with your thoughts on some of the high ratings for some of those RBs. Too bad Justin Gatlin didn’t make the NFL, just for Madden fun. He would have a 100+ speed rating. You could rip circles around everyone, but never catch a ball because his catching would be at like 20…

David
Jul 23, 2008 21:43

A lot of players are below 80, but I only went over the important guys. No one wants to hear about Tatum Bell’s 75, or Marcus Thomas’s 73. As for the ratings? I dunno, I guess you can think of it like a percentage. 99 is very good (I think there is only a very occasional 100) and 60 is pretty bad.

Leave a Reply

Comment

Most Popular Content

News - Aug 16, 2008 22:13 - 0 Comments

Valkyria Chronicles Reporting For Duty November 11

More In News


Reviews - Aug 5, 2008 17:34 - 0 Comments

Enemy Territories: Quake Wars

More In Reviews


Features - Jul 29, 2008 23:30 - 1 Comment

QuikRamble: July 30th

More In Features